When I asked Phil to make the review findings available on the website I did not intend it to appear as some sort of leaked document - and should have made this clear to Phil.
The team selection and subsequent request for this review has caused a lot of discussion on our mailing list. I have made it available so that those who contributed to the discussion and others who may be interested can read the conclusion.
John

And on re-reading my Post I can see how that that conclusion is drawn.
It was not my intention to make it seem so, and my apologies for any false impression given.
Thats what you get for doing things in the wee hours of the morning.

I have edited my Original post to make it rather clearer.

While I am prepared to accept the Exec review panels general conclusions there are some issues that were not addressed and a significant factual innaccuracy in that the complain raised by me was also on behalf of a significant number of other pilots who supported it.
That matter has been raised by some of those other pilots directly with the BHPA chairman so there may yet be a modification of the published response to reflect the true facts.

At the next exec meeting the official record regarding this complaint is expected to be modified to show it was supported by other pilots - as was requested by Richard Lovelace and Malcolm Brown.